Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nino Floris <mail(at)ninofloris(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support
Date: 2020-03-06 17:40:45
Message-ID: 11758.1583516445@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nino Floris <mail(at)ninofloris(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is the new patch rebased onto master.

The approach of simply providing a 1.2 installation script, with no
upgrade path from 1.1, is surely not going to be acceptable to anyone
who's using ltree in production.

Fortunately for the odds of getting this patch accepted, we just
pushed an ALTER TYPE improvement that will solve your problem [1].
Please replace ltree--1.2.sql with an upgrade script that uses
that, and resubmit.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=fe30e7ebfa3846416f1adeb7cf611006513a4ee0

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-03-06 17:49:21 Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-03-06 17:33:54 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.