Re: ruby-postgres for Ruby 1.9

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Chris Long <galizur(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruby-postgres for Ruby 1.9
Date: 2007-03-01 21:32:27
Message-ID: 1172784747.13722.106.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 04:05 -0800, Chris Long wrote:
> It looks like ruby-postgres needs some patching due to the changes
> in rubyio.h. I believe these two changes take care of the problem:
>
> /* PQtrace(get_pgconn(obj), fp->f2?fp->f2:fp->f); */
> PQtrace(get_pgconn(obj), fp->stdio_file);
>
> /* PQprint(fp->f2?fp->f2:fp->f, get_pgresult(obj), &po);*/
> PQprint(fp->stdio_file, get_pgresult(obj), &po);
>
> I'm using the force a bit here, and assuming that the additional
> pointer for rw pipes has been deprecated. In my defense it compiles
> and runs.
>
> Who's the current maintainer of ruby-postgres?

[I see that this is a cross post with ruby-talk, so I'm pasting my
answer here also]

Dave Lee is the current maintainer, dave(at)cherryville(dot)org, and I have
quite a few fixes that I'd like applied as well. He's been busy for the
past few months, so I haven't had much luck getting the fixes in. He's
supposed to be giving me read access to the repository so I can at least
see what he's committing to it, but I've been waiting on that for a
while, too.

Overall, the module needs a substantial amount of work (it's still using
deprecated API functions, for instance).

Regards,
Jeff Davis

PS: He has another email address also, but I don't want to post that on
a public list because I haven't seen it in other public lists/sites.

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message samira khansha 2007-03-04 08:37:56 postgresql and XML
Previous Message John DeSoi 2007-03-01 21:09:37 Re: libpq.a and Xcode on Mac OS X