Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-20 00:53:40
Message-ID: 1169254420.27197.35.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 19:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think having it in core makes the most sense.

Why is that?

One question that comes to mind is how the submitted patch compares in
functionality to the other implementations of the UUID concept for
PostgreSQL, such as OSSP uuid (which implements a Postgres UDT in its
CVS version), or the UUID project on gborg.


In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jeremy DrakeDate: 2007-01-20 00:59:52
Subject: largeobject regression tests - updated patch
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-20 00:19:15
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group