Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-20 00:53:40
Message-ID: 1169254420.27197.35.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 19:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think having it in core makes the most sense.

Why is that?

One question that comes to mind is how the submitted patch compares in
functionality to the other implementations of the UUID concept for
PostgreSQL, such as OSSP uuid (which implements a Postgres UDT in its
CVS version), or the UUID project on gborg.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-01-20 00:59:52 largeobject regression tests - updated patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-20 00:19:15 Re: guid/uuid datatype