Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP patch for "operator families"

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP patch for "operator families"
Date: 2006-12-27 21:36:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> > into "operator families", as per discussion last week.  It's far from
> > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments.  What's done
> > is ...
> > Comments?
> Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
> would be more visible?

I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP.

  Simon Riggs             

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Roman KononovDate: 2006-12-27 21:43:49
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-27 21:35:33
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group