Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Switching to XML

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: 2006-12-10 16:51:24
Message-ID: 1165769484.13210.35.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 17:37 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I'm not stonewalling anything.  If someone wants to prepare a case for 
> moving to XML, be my guest.  I'm just here to debunk the reasons for 
> moving to XML which are wrong.

O.k. how about this:

We want to move to XML. We have community members that want to move to
XML. We have regional projects that want to move to XML. 

You can not debunk any of those reasons.

The fact is, they want to.

Until you can come up with a reason why we *shouldn't* move to XML. I
believe this issue is settled.


Joshua D. Drake


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-12-10 16:52:23
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-12-10 16:49:41
Subject: Re: Switching to XML

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group