Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] Out of memory error causes Abort, Abort tries

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Out of memory error causes Abort, Abort tries
Date: 2006-11-28 02:22:41
Message-ID: 1164680561.7773.86.camel@dogma.v10.wvs (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> >> Wasteful how? Do you mean that it would clutter the code, or that it
> >> would cause unnecessary overhead? 
> > Well, it'd be an extra however-many-KB of memory for each backend that
> > would mostly go unused.  The rest of a backend's working memory pretty
> > much pulls its weight, but a TransactionAbortContext wouldn't.  OTOH,
> > maybe these days a few dozen KB isn't worth worrying about.
> After further thought I concluded that overloading ErrorContext for this
> purpose is way too risky, so I've committed changes that create a
> separate context for AbortTransaction to use:
> I think the patch would apply cleanly to 8.1 but have not got time to
> check it now.  Less sure about older branches.  Are we excited about
> trying to back-patch this?  I think it'd really need rather more testing
> before I'd want to stick it into the stable branches ...

Everything in the patch makes sense to me, and it certainly solved my
test case.

I'm just fine with the fix only in 8.2. I can work around it until I can

	Jeff Davis

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2006-11-28 04:31:29
Subject: ecpg_config.h not installed
Previous:From: Joseph SDate: 2006-11-28 02:08:21
Subject: Re: doc patch for savepoints

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-28 02:56:50
Subject: Re: BUG #2781: database dump/restore problems
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2006-11-28 00:46:12
Subject: Re: Unexpected sort order.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group