Re: [Pgcluster-general] PostgreSQL Documentation of

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, a(dot)mitani(at)sra-europe(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgcluster-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Pgcluster-general] PostgreSQL Documentation of
Date: 2006-11-21 21:57:53
Message-ID: 1164146273.24113.157.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 16:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I feel the shared-* issue splits us up like master/slave and
> > > multi-master splits up
> >
> > No, not quite. To sum up, I'd say the following combinations make sense:
> >
> > sync, multi-master replication on shared-memory cluster (which is much
> > like a super-computer. With shared memory distributing locks does not
> > cost much - beside marketing, there is probably not much sense in
> > calling this a cluster at all).
>
> Wow, how is that different than an multi-CPU server?

You can't have 1000 cpus :).. You can have 1000 dual core servers.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-11-21 22:31:24 Re: [Pgcluster-general] PostgreSQL Documentation of
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-21 21:51:42 Re: [Pgcluster-general] PostgreSQL Documentation of