| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kenneth Marshall" <ktm(at)it(dot)is(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Balazs Nagy" <bnagy(at)thenewpush(dot)com>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] BUG #2737: hash indexing largetablefails, while btree of same index works |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 14:38:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1163774292.27956.705.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 08:26 -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> I certainly hold out some hope that they can improved. I would like to see
> them still included. Once they are gone, it will be much harder to ever
> add them back.
OK, you got it - keep hash indexes then.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-17 15:08:47 | Re: [PERFORM] BUG #2737: hash indexing large tablefails, while btree of same index works |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2006-11-17 14:26:57 | Re: [PERFORM] BUG #2737: hash indexing large tablefails, while btree of same index works |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-17 15:08:47 | Re: [PERFORM] BUG #2737: hash indexing large tablefails, while btree of same index works |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2006-11-17 14:26:57 | Re: [PERFORM] BUG #2737: hash indexing large tablefails, while btree of same index works |