Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Date: 2006-11-05 18:15:24
Message-ID: 1162750525.3587.919.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> I don't see why we should go out of our way to
> provide a bad substitute for pwd.

That argument is conclusive. Agreed.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-05 18:24:55 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-05 17:01:54 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-05 18:24:55 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-05 17:01:54 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing