Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble
Date: 2007-07-20 17:59:38
Message-ID: 11619.1184954378@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> Also, what was the danger with linking pthread?

Basically, the worry with code that wants thread support is that it
might actually try to use that support, and the backend in general will
not survive that (no threading protections). Also, depending on your
platform, linking in thread support might incur some generalized
overhead costs even when it's not being used; for instance the malloc
functions might start using mutexes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-20 20:35:59 Re: SSPI authentication - patch
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2007-07-20 17:32:39 Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble