From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | kmh496 <kmh496(at)kornet(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PG on zeta 1.0 |
Date: | 2006-05-20 16:39:08 |
Message-ID: | 11596.1148143148@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
kmh496 <kmh496(at)kornet(dot)net> writes:
> 2006-05-20 (), 11:53 -0400, Tom Lane :
>> It looks to me like you don't have DNS correctly configured on that
>> machine. Every machine should be able to resolve "localhost" as
>> "127.0.0.1" --- that's standard. Look at name resolution settings,
>> /etc/resolv.conf, that sort of thing.
> i think it's the port for an unknown reason. I don't have any port
> number listed for 5543 but it gives me the same error when i try to use
> it. If I use port 55543 however there is no problem.
Really? That's very interesting. Have you tried adding 5432 to
/etc/services and then referencing the port number by the name you
give it there? I've never heard of a resolver rejecting numerical
specifications for low-numbered ports, but there's a first time for
everything ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kmh496 | 2006-05-20 17:09:07 | Re: PG on zeta 1.0 |
Previous Message | kmh496 | 2006-05-20 16:23:16 | Re: PG on zeta 1.0 |