Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Merge Join vs Nested Loop

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Merge Join vs Nested Loop
Date: 2006-09-27 15:19:24
Message-ID: 1159370365.4643.7.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 17:05 +0200, Tobias Brox wrote:
> [Scott Marlowe - Wed at 09:58:30AM -0500]
> > Have you tried chaning the cpu_* cost options to see how they affect
> > merge versus nested loop?
> As said in the original post, increasing any of them shifts the planner
> towards nested loops instead of merge_join.  I didn't check which one of
> the cost constants made the most impact.

So, by decreasing them, you should move away from nested loops then,
right?  Has that not worked for some reason?

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tobias BroxDate: 2006-09-27 15:26:55
Subject: Re: Merge Join vs Nested Loop
Previous:From: Tobias BroxDate: 2006-09-27 15:05:12
Subject: Re: Merge Join vs Nested Loop

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group