Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: setseed() doc

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setseed() doc
Date: 2006-09-20 15:10:15
Message-ID: 1158765015.5151.1.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICT it's just junk.  It happens to be the input times
> MAX_RANDOM_VALUE, but what use is that?  I wonder if we shouldn't
> change the function to return VOID

I agree. Given how soon we want to get an 8.2 beta out the door, perhaps
this change would be best postponed to 8.3 (unless there's another
outstanding 8.2 patch that requires initdb?).


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-09-20 15:46:24
Subject: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-09-20 15:05:35
Subject: Re: pdfs of the conference

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-20 15:47:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] setseed() doc
Previous:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-09-20 14:50:24
Subject: Re: Dynamic linking on AIX

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group