| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation bug regarding collations |
| Date: | 2012-01-29 01:56:42 |
| Message-ID: | 11554.1327802202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> in the description of the ORDER BY clause (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-select.html#SQL-ORDERBY) it says:
> "Character-string data is sorted according to the locale-specific collation order that was established when the database was created."
> Which is no longer true with 9.1 as it is possible to define the collation on a per-column basis or as part of the ORDER BY clause.
> I think a link to the collation chapter and a description on the "precedence" of the definitions should be added to that part.
Done, thanks for the report.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-29 02:08:26 | Re: Example in plpgsql docs can lead to infinite loop |
| Previous Message | Michael Brauwerman | 2012-01-29 01:45:00 | Re: BUG #6200: standby bad memory allocations on SELECT |