Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>,Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>,"Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>,Jie Zhang <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>,Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Date: 2006-07-28 22:54:08
Message-ID: 1154127248.2961.39.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-07-28 kell 16:25, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> What we don't want to happen is for us to release bitmapped indexes, and
> find out later that btree is better in all cases.  

Actually I'd love it if adding bitmap indexes to core pg would magically
make btree several times faster for the cases where bitmap indexes are
faster now :)

Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia

Skype me:  callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free:

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-07-29 00:19:14
Subject: Re: pg_dump: add option to ignore TABLE DATA for failed
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2006-07-28 22:47:30
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group