Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Date: 2006-05-19 16:41:40
Message-ID: 1148056900.2646.687.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > What I'd suggest is resuming the test after making sure you've killed
> > off any old archivers, and seeing if you can make any progress on
> > reproducing the original problem. We definitely need a
> > multiple-archiver interlock, but I think that must be unrelated to your
> > real problem.
>
> Ok, so I've got the old archivers gone (and btw, after a restart I ended up
> with 3 of them - so I stopped postmaster, and killed them all individually and
> started postmaster again).

Thats good.

> Now I can run my same pg_bench, or do you guys
> have any other suggestions on attempting to reproduce the problem?

No. We're back on track to try to reproduce the original error.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-05-19 20:00:57 Re: query optimization - mysql vs postgresql
Previous Message Jeff Frost 2006-05-19 16:36:47 Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Ellsworth 2006-05-19 16:42:49 Re: [HACKERS] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach.
Previous Message Jeff Frost 2006-05-19 16:36:47 Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?