| From: | Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarck PostgreSQL 8.1.4 MySQL 5.0.20 and Oracle |
| Date: | 2006-05-18 10:16:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1147947373.7943.35.camel@dell.home.lan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello :)
What version would PostgreSQL 8.1.4 be?
> I'm running a benchmark with theses 3 databases, and the first results
> are not very good for PostgreSQL.
Could you give us some more infos about the box' performance while you
run the PG benchmark? A few minutes output of "vmstat 10" maybe? What
does "top" say?
> My benchmark uses the same server for theses 3 databases :
> Dell Power edge - Xeon 2.8 Ghz - 2 Go Ram - 3 SCSI disks - Debian
> Sarge - Linux 2.6
How are you using the 3 disks? Did you split pg_xlog and the database
on different disks or not?
> The transactions are a random mix of request in read (select) and
> write (insert, delete, update) on many tables about 100 000 to 15 000
> 000 rows.
>
> Transactions are executed from 500 connections.
Can you say something about the clients? Do they run over network from
other hosts? What language/bindings do they use?
When they do inserts, are the inserts bundled or are there
single insert transactions? Are the statements prepared?
Bye, Chris.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Olivier Andreotti | 2006-05-18 10:42:57 | Re: Benchmarck PostgreSQL 8.1.4 MySQL 5.0.20 and Oracle |
| Previous Message | Olivier Andreotti | 2006-05-18 09:57:26 | Benchmarck PostgreSQL 8.1.4 MySQL 5.0.20 and Oracle 10g2 |