Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>,Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>,Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Date: 2005-12-26 12:03:27
Message-ID: 1135598607.2964.702.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 10:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> An ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED switch might have some merit, but
> please don't muddy the waters by confusing this with temp-table
> status.

I would not be against such a table-level switch, but the exact
behaviour would need to be specified more closely before this became a
TODO item, IMHO.

If someone has a 100 GB table, they would not appreciate the table being
truncated if a transaction to load 1 GB of data aborts, forcing recovery
of the 100 GB table.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-12-26 12:22:12
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-12-26 11:04:26
Subject: Re: Incremental Backup Script

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group