| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using multi-row technique with COPY |
| Date: | 2005-12-02 09:39:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1133516346.2906.529.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 02:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > [...context omitted...]
> > We would need to flush all the blocks in the table out of cache at
> > commit time, for that table only.
>
> This seems striking close to the Old Concept of temp tables, which
> we got rid of for good-and-sufficient reasons. You might want to
> spend some time reviewing the archives before proposing that we
> reintroduce it.
My suggestion is that I use the same mechanism as was introduced for 8.1
with the CREATE TABLE AS SELECT statement.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-02 09:48:16 | Re: slow IN() clause for many cases |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-12-02 08:57:14 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |