Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>,Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-25 16:42:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't see the gain of having a file called pg_xlog vs. using GUC.

Well, the point is to have a safety interlock --- but I like Jan's
idea of using matching identification files in both directories.
With that, a GUC variable seems just fine.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: 韩近强Date: 2002-09-25 16:55:18
Subject: inquiry
Previous:From: jeffDate: 2002-09-25 16:36:36
Subject: initdb failed due to syntax error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group