Michael Graham <mgraham(at)bloxx(dot)com> writes:
> I was playing around with some sql in postgres and got to wondering why
> the optimiser can't figure out that rearranging some expressions can
> result in massive improvements in the queue plan. For example id + 5 <
> 100 compared with id < 100 - 5.
> Is it simply that no one has go around to doing it or is there some
> deeper reasons? It's not really important I'm just curious.
Well, it'd require a very large amount of
type-specific/operator-specific knowledge, and it's not clear what would
drive the planner towards doing useful rearrangements rather than
counterproductive ones, and the number of real-world queries where it'd
actually help doesn't seem to be that large. I've seen one or two
complaints about that sort of thing, but it's way way down the list
of serious problems.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Scott Ribe||Date: 2011-05-04 15:07:30|
|Subject: SSDD reliability|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2011-05-04 14:32:15|
|Subject: Re: pervasiveness of surrogate (also called synthetic) keys|