Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...
Date: 2005-06-01 01:55:23
Message-ID: 1117590923.6678.66.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 09:30 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> This whole GiST concurrency think really needs to be looked at :(

I spent some time looking at it toward the end of last year, but
unfortunately I didn't have enough time to devote to it to get a working
implementation (it is quite a lot of work). I'm still interesting in
working on it, although I won't have any time until after 8.1.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Satoshi NagayasuDate: 2005-06-01 02:03:09
Subject: Re: audit facilities?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-06-01 01:44:28
Subject: Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group