Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COPY Fillfactor patch

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Subject: Re: COPY Fillfactor patch
Date: 2005-04-20 13:14:41
Message-ID: 1114002882.16721.2228.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.

I hope not, but it would be easier to set like that and a lot easier to
code up that way.

Trouble is, if you need it, it needs to be varied according to what is
happening to a particular relation. Otherwise you'd gain benefit in one
area and lose it in another.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-20 13:42:55
Subject: Re: COPY Fillfactor patch
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-04-20 13:07:53
Subject: Re: COPY Fillfactor patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group