Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: _RollbackFunc : dead code?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>,Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: _RollbackFunc : dead code?
Date: 2005-03-31 16:07:39
Message-ID: 1112285260.16721.274.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 16:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > So I think this is dead code.  The attached patch removes it.
> Yeah, it is dead code; it's a leftover from Vadim's old plan to implement
> Oracle-style UNDO.  AFAIK none of the current crop of hackers wants to
> proceed in that direction, so we may as well remove the last traces.


We still need to explain *why* at some point, but thats still one of my

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-03-31 16:24:33
Subject: Re: _RollbackFunc : dead code?
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2005-03-31 16:02:19
Subject: Re: TSearch2 performance issue?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group