Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication solutions high volume db

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: David B <davidb999(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication solutions high volume db
Date: 2005-03-30 00:16:37
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:12 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think I've narrowed it down to Slony and Mammoth.
> > > Any pro's or con's on one vs the other?
> > 
> > Slony is more complicated to setup.
> > Slony requires triggers and cron.
> Triggers yes, cron no...

Oh? Good to know.

> > It used to be that Slony was timed replication. I do not know if that is
> > still the case.
> Not the case now.  I didn't use it "back in the day" (you know, last
> year :)

I know.. that is so 2004 :)


Joshua D. Drake

Command Prompt, Inc., Your PostgreSQL solutions company. 503-667-4564
Custom programming, 24x7 support, managed services, and hosting
Open Source Authors: plPHP, pgManage, Co-Authors: plPerlNG
Reliable replication, Mammoth Replicator -

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-03-30 00:16:58
Subject: Re: Replication solutions high volume db
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2005-03-30 00:12:47
Subject: Re: Replication solutions high volume db

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group