| From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Ryan S(dot) Puncia" <mpuncia(at)census(dot)gov(dot)ph> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM |
| Date: | 2005-02-15 02:21:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1108434116.67118.92.camel@home |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:34 +0800, Michael Ryan S. Puncia wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have 3 tables in the database with 80G of data, one of them is
> almost 40G and the remaining 2 tables has 20G each.
>
> We use this database mainly for query and updating is done only
> quarterly and the database perform well. My problem
>
> is after updating and then run VACCUM FULL ANALYZE vacuuming the
> tables takes days to complete. I hope someone
I suspect the VACUUM FULL is the painful part. Try running CLUSTER on
the table or changing a column type (in 8.0) instead.
--
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Iain | 2005-02-15 02:31:14 | Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM |
| Previous Message | Michael Ryan S. Puncia | 2005-02-15 02:10:30 | Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM |