On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:32 +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> I realize it's a bit late, but it might not be a bad idea to use
> CURRENT_TIMESTAMP rather than NOW(), as it's per SQL spec.
I can't say I can get very excited about it; someone is free to submit a
patch if they like.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-02-11 00:36:00|
|Subject: Re: WIP: pl/pgsql cleanup|
|Previous:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2005-02-10 21:10:50|
|Subject: [Fwd: Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics]|