From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix two bugs in change_owner_recurse_to_sequences: it was |
Date: | 2005-03-26 06:35:20 |
Message-ID: | 11051.1111818920@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I assume that this behaviour makes change owner on a table change owner
> of serial sequences?
Yeah.
> Should we perhaps also propagate grant insert on a table to grant
> select, update on dependent serial sequences?
Doesn't really follow. That code is maintaining an invariant: the owner
of a table owns the associated indexes, toast table, sequences, etc.
There's no system-wide assumption that sequence privileges track table
privileges.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-03-26 06:55:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix two bugs in change_owner_recurse_to_sequences: it was |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-03-26 06:30:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix two bugs in change_owner_recurse_to_sequences: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-03-26 06:55:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix two bugs in change_owner_recurse_to_sequences: it was |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-03-26 06:30:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix two bugs in change_owner_recurse_to_sequences: |