| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Date: | 2004-11-09 17:31:55 |
| Message-ID: | 1100021515.4442.155.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 17:04, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:47:48PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I have been asked about why there is no single preferred Replication
> > Solution etc...; I said it was the nature of the development community
> > that many ideas are allowed out at once.
>
> I don't know that this is the only reason.
Completely agree, but knowing I would be quoted, I had to say something
and didn't want to upset too many applecarts.
This post is all about: "so what do we say then?"
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-11-09 17:38:56 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-11-09 17:04:18 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |