Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-09 17:31:55
Message-ID: 1100021515.4442.155.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 17:04, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:47:48PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I have been asked about why there is no single preferred Replication
> > Solution etc...; I said it was the nature of the development community
> > that many ideas are allowed out at once.
> I don't know that this is the only reason.  

Completely agree, but knowing I would be quoted, I had to say something
and didn't want to upset too many applecarts.

This post is all about: "so what do we say then?"

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2004-11-09 17:38:56
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2004-11-09 17:04:18
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group