W liście z wto, 21-09-2004, godz. 03:50, Kris Jurka pisze:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2004, Jaroslaw J. Pyszny wrote:
> The basic idea looks good to me, but you've made a mistake in the
> isAutoIncrement() method. You are using the column number from the
> ResultSet to look up the default when you need to actually use that
> column's position in the table. In fact it looks like the whole method
> body should be moved into the Field class much like the isNullable method
> does. This also avoid the contrived hash key value.
> Finally we prefer patches in context diff format (diff -c).
I'll try fix it.
8 \\|||// Jarosław J. Pyszny <arghil(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl>
b (o|o) Linux admin/devel ("Vitae,non scholae,discimus")
i --\_/-- Linux user: #96704 (http://counter.li.org)
t =->computers - let me know if you want to get rid of it <-=
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Dave Cramer||Date: 2004-09-21 20:31:15|
|Subject: Re: Auto-increment serial (Postgresql JDBC driver w/|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2004-09-21 17:49:46|
|Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.|