On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 13:13, Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:23:35 -0400, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
> >The below plpgsql forces the kind of algorithm we wish the planner could
> >choose. It should be fairly quick irregardless of dataset.
> That reminds me of hash aggregation. So here's another idea for Vitaly:
The reason for the function is that the sort routines (hash aggregation
included) will not stop in mid-sort, although I believe that feature is
on the TODO list.
I believe Vitaly will achieve 10ms or less query times using that
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Manfred Koizar||Date: 2004-04-29 17:59:13|
|Subject: Re: Simply join in PostrgeSQL takes too long|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2004-04-29 17:23:58|
|Subject: Re: Use arrays or not?|