| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Edoardo Ceccarelli <eddy(at)axa(dot)it>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] [PERFORM] is a good practice to create an index on the |
| Date: | 2004-04-27 15:18:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1083079114.14759.204.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc pgsql-performance |
Edoardo,
Are you using them for referential integrity? If so you would be wise to
use sequences instead.
Christopher: yes you are correct, I wasn't sure if that is what he was
doing.
Dave
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 11:01, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > AFAIK, oids aren't used for anything internally, so duplicates don't
> > really matter. Besides, what would you do about duplicate oid's ?
>
> If he's using them _externally_, then he does have to worry about
> duplicates.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:408e75e0137721921318500!
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Hoover | 2004-04-27 17:21:34 | Breaking out log by database |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-04-27 15:01:22 | Re: [JDBC] [PERFORM] is a good practice to create an index on the |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2004-04-27 18:52:58 | setCatalog |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-04-27 15:01:22 | Re: [JDBC] [PERFORM] is a good practice to create an index on the |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Silke Trissl | 2004-04-27 17:32:36 | Join problem |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-04-27 15:01:22 | Re: [JDBC] [PERFORM] is a good practice to create an index on the |