From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bug message not CC'ing poster |
Date: | 2004-03-18 15:54:41 |
Message-ID: | 1079625281.11890.170.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I just got this email from the bugs list:
> > [BUGS] BUG #1107: Missing feature: interval <-> numeric quantity conversion
> > The email had the bugs list as a reply, but no entry for the original
> > poster. I had to copy his email address from the email body into the
> > CC. Is the bug form posting configured properly?
>
> This has been complained of before. It used to be that the bug form
> sent mail with the submitter shown in the From: line. Lately it is
> producing mail From: "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> which is really quite useless. It'd be nice to get back to the old
> behavior so you don't have to hand-hack the headers of your reply.
>
I'm just guessing the behavior was changed to keep form emails from
being delayed via non-subscribed emails trying to post to the list? I
think we should be able to set the reply-to headers to include both
pgsql-bugs and the submitters email address... would that be accetable?
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-03-18 16:02:46 | Re: Gborg CVS Commit Messages |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-18 15:46:01 | Re: bug message not CC'ing poster |