Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bug message not CC'ing poster

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug message not CC'ing poster
Date: 2004-03-18 15:54:41
Message-ID: 1079625281.11890.170.camel@camel (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I just got this email from the bugs list:
> > 	[BUGS] BUG #1107: Missing feature: interval <-> numeric quantity conversion
> > The email had the bugs list as a reply, but no entry for the original
> > poster.  I had to copy his email address from the email body into the
> > CC.  Is the bug form posting configured properly?
> This has been complained of before.  It used to be that the bug form
> sent mail with the submitter shown in the From: line.  Lately it is
> producing mail From: "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> which is really quite useless.  It'd be nice to get back to the old
> behavior so you don't have to hand-hack the headers of your reply.

I'm just guessing the behavior was changed to keep form emails from
being delayed via non-subscribed emails trying to post to the list? I
think we should be able to set the reply-to headers to include both
pgsql-bugs and the submitters email address... would that be accetable?

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-03-18 16:02:46
Subject: Re: Gborg CVS Commit Messages
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-18 15:46:01
Subject: Re: bug message not CC'ing poster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group