Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

From: "Lawrence E(dot) Smithmier, Jr(dot)" <Larry(at)Smithmier(dot)com>
To: tswan(at)idigx(dot)com
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, tswan(at)idigx(dot)com,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <zeugswettera(at)spardat(dot)at>,Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces
Date: 2004-03-04 21:46:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32

> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
>>>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>>>> symlinks.
>> To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
>> I think Win2000 or XP would be a reasonable restriction for Win32 PG
>> installations that want tablespaces.
> Oh, good --- symlinks for directories are all that we need for this
> design.  I think that settles it then.

Er, sorry to drop into the middle of this but do you want to cripple a port
before it is even complete?  Is there a compelling reason to use symlinks rather
than a flat file?  If the issue is just:

> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>how the low-level file access code finds a tablespace.

then what is wrong with using an XML file that is loaded and traversed at start
up?  I agree it would be a cool to use the file system as a database, but why
place a possible limiting factor for the sake of elegance?  Isn't XML a valid
and accepted way to store hierarchial data?

> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I am expecting to hear some bleating about this from people whose
> preferred platforms don't support symlinks ;-).  However, if we don't

Well bleat I guess.  Although I wouldn't exactly say preferred.  I prefer to
think of myself as a realest getting paid to program on a platform.  A platform
with symlinks carrying quite a bit of baggage.  On NTFS they are called Junction
Points and are a special type of Reparse Point.  One thing I noticed on the
Microsoft site regarding these:

>Reparse Points are a powerful feature of Windows 2000 (not available on Windows
>NT® 4.0), but developers should be aware that there can only be one reparse 
>point per file, and some new Windows 2000 mechanisms use reparse points (HSM, 
>Native Structured Storage). Developers need to have fallback strategies for 
>when the reparse point tag is already in use for a file.

makes me question their usefulness at this point.  I am currently exploring
another solution to the problem that caused me to investigate them.

Well, thanks for your time.  I guess I can go baaack to lurking now. ;-)

Lawrence E. Smithmier, Jr.
(919) 522-9738

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-03-04 21:57:10
Subject: Minutes from Pl/Java - next step IRC
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-04 21:04:05
Subject: Re: A plan to improve error messages with context, hint and details.

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Dann CorbitDate: 2004-03-04 22:47:24
Subject: Another crack at doing a Win32 build under MINGW
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-04 21:05:00
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group