| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] INSTEAD rule bug? |
| Date: | 2003-07-16 04:04:21 |
| Message-ID: | 10734.1058328261@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:
> It would have saved a lot of trouble if it just complained about that
> union thing right away and refuse to create the rule...
That's what happens in CVS tip.
> On a different note, I think there *is* a way to add a where clause to
> the union - that's exactly what I did in that last example - by
> converting it into a subselect...
> Can that not be done automatically for conditional rules?
Send a patch... or at least convince us it can be done ... I'm not
convinced yet.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wehrle, Daniel | 2003-07-16 07:37:48 | Re: pg_dump -t option doesn't take schema-qualified table |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Tkach | 2003-07-15 21:53:13 | Re: [GENERAL] INSTEAD rule bug? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2003-07-16 05:26:20 | Re: perfromance impact of vacuum |
| Previous Message | Litel Wang | 2003-07-16 02:51:30 | why can't I find the other schemas in my restored database except public schemas ? |