Re: Indexes not always used after inserts/updates/vacuum analyze

"Michael G. Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com> writes:
> Here is what I would expect which usually happens:

> explain select * from symbol_data where symbol_name='IBM';
> Index Scan using symbol_data_pkey on symbol_data (cost=0.00..512.99 rows=128 width=129)

> Here is one that fails:

> explain select * from symbol_data where symbol_name='ELTE';
> Seq Scan on symbol_data (cost=0.00..707415.32 rows=438015 width=129)

The planner thinks that there are 438K occurrences of 'ELTE' in your
table. If that's true, a sequential scan is not obviously the wrong
choice. How many are there, in reality? What do you get from

select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'symbol_data' and attname =
'symbol_name';

Also, to put the rubber to the road: if you force an indexscan by
doing "set enable_seqscan = off", does it get faster or slower?
(EXPLAIN ANALYZE would be useful here.)

regards, tom lane