Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.
Date: 2003-11-18 14:55:38
Message-ID: 1069167338.10335.7266.camel@camel (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 09:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:08:58AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > 
> > I submit'd it, and it got rejected ...
> Submit a note to other site saying that Slashdot rejects news about
> PostgreSQL :-)

Yeah really... that seems like almost enough of a nugget for a news item
itself...  "slashdot rejects announcement of a major release of a major
open source software project"... an insider for the venerable news site
who spoke on the condition of anonymity said "every time we put up a
postgresql news item, the flame wars that erupt from the other open
source databases completely overload our message boards. as long as we
keep running on mysql, we just can't afford to give postgresql any press


Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-11-18 15:00:17
Subject: Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.
Previous:From: Marek LewczukDate: 2003-11-18 14:43:50
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group