Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-24 15:21:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 2:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The connection is the question of where to do CommandCounterIncrement
>> between successive DML WITH operations in a single command.

> .. what?  We decided *not* to do any CommandCounterIncrements between 

Oh, did we decide to do it that way?  OK with me, but the submitted docs
are woefully inadequate on the point.  This behavior is going to have to
be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
about it :-().

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2011-02-24 15:28:50
Subject: Re: Named restore points
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-02-24 15:07:35
Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group