Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Press Release

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Press Release
Date: 2003-10-29 22:59:34
Message-ID: 1067468374.2070.29962.camel@camel (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:24, Josh Berkus wrote:
> If anybody has evidence that the FSM index management doens't work, then we'll 
> cut the paragraph.  However, I'm inclined to trust Tom & Co., and my only 
> simple tests seemed to uphold the Lazy-Vacuum-ability of indexes.

Tom has laid out at least one case where the potential for index growth
exits, though I don't see it in a quick search of the archives...

Tom, can you weigh in here?

Robert Treat  
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: scott.marloweDate: 2003-10-29 23:03:50
Subject: Re: Press Release
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2003-10-29 22:58:42
Subject: Re: Press Release and eRServer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group