Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>,Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not
Date: 2003-10-29 03:22:14
Message-ID: 1067397733.99917.21.camel@jester (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:34, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a 
> > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
> > 
> > Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
> Me, hardly ever use them  :-)  So I can assume that removing the implicit 
> pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."

From the search_path certainly -- but we can we teach the difference
between implicit and explicit to the *is_visible functions?

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-29 03:36:00
Subject: Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails
Previous:From: John DeSoiDate: 2003-10-29 02:38:29
Subject: Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: kedar kompalliDate: 2003-10-29 12:49:04
Subject: installation and configuration of postgresql
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-10-29 01:53:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not working?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group