Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.2.3?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.2.3?
Date: 2002-09-29 14:28:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> The initial Postgres design had a notion of StorageManager's, which
> should make this very easy indeed, if it had been kept working .

But the storage manager interface was never built to hide issues like
tuple representation --- storage managers just deal in raw pages.
I doubt it would have helped in the least for anything we've been
concerned about.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: 7.2.3? at 2002-09-29 07:50:47 from Hannu Krosing


  • Re: 7.2.3? at 2002-09-29 17:05:55 from Hannu Krosing

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-09-29 14:57:38
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-29 13:38:27
Subject: Re: making use of large TLB pages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group