Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load

From: matt <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load
Date: 2003-08-28 08:17:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
> Are you *sure* about that????  3K updates/inserts per second xlates
> to 10,800,000 per hour.  That, my friend, is a WHOLE HECK OF A LOT!

Yup, I know!  

> During the 1 hour surge, will SELECTs at 10 minutes after the 
> hour depend on INSERTs at 5 minutes after the hour?

Yes, they do.  It's a payments system, so things like account balances
and purchase histories have to be updated in real time.

> Only one hour out of 168?????  May I ask what kind of app it is?

Online voting for an unnamed TV show...

> > If the best price/performance option is a second hand 32-cpu Alpha
> > running VMS I'd be happy to go that way ;-)
> I'd love to work on a GS320!  You may even pick one up for a million
> or 2.  The license costs for VMS & Rdb would eat you, though.

You'd be amazed how little they do go for actually :-)

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Ron JohnsonDate: 2003-08-28 09:02:36
Subject: Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load
Previous:From: Dennis BjörklundDate: 2003-08-28 08:11:02
Subject: Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2003-08-28 08:19:57
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-08-28 07:07:53
Subject: Re: Replication Ideas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group