| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, elein(at)varlena(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Date: | 2003-04-14 12:44:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1050324276.9816.13.camel@camel |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 23:38, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> > Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> > management, and revision history. I have investigated this extensively, and
> > there are *no* production-ready, pure OSS, CMS for PostgreSQL running on PHP
> > or Perl. I was looking at developing one with Andy Chase (based on his
> > "SnapSnap"), but then he got a job and Zapatec announced the launch of Bloki.
>
> What's wrong with Bricolage?
>
> Chris
>
Actually I'm still waiting to here what was wrong with the current plan
to move the site to the zope/wiki engine...
Robert Treat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | justin | 2003-04-14 13:44:22 | Fwd: A within the next day or two request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-04-14 11:13:10 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |