| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Date: | 2003-04-10 16:55:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1049993718.1886.27.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Hannu Krosing kirjutas N, 10.04.2003 kell 19:50:
> I would propose something like X11 protocol (from memory)
>
> each request (query) has a serial number.
>
> eash response is sent in resonable sized chunks, and each chunk has a
> serial number of request, chunk number of response and an indicator for
> EndOfResponse (or perhaps to for Completed or Aborted).
They should both have size as well, as Tom suggested.
> This would make resyncing easier as you can safely ignore responsed you
> dont wan't to see anymore even if for some reasons some of them are
> still in pipeline.
>
> What could be useful (and is often requested) is sending the number of
> records in response *if it is known without extra work*.
>
> Also there should be a way to tell the backend not to send some types of
> notices/warnings.
-----------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-10 16:59:37 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-04-10 16:50:35 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-10 16:59:37 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-04-10 16:50:35 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |