Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere

From: John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere
Date: 2003-04-01 04:55:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
This isn't more that a month or two old.
The previous version worried about nested transactions. 
I know Bruce has been thinking about that for a while now, so possibly
that was crossed off as 'fixed'. The 7.4 Docs cover the unlimited
precision "NUMERIC" type, so perhaps that also should be crossed off.

The use of 'out' parameters sounds hairy though.



On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 15:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> > For those interested in porting from Oracle to PG, refer
> >
> I can't see any indication of the date this was written --- but I get
> the feeling it dates back a bit.  At least some of the issues mentioned
> have been solved in recent PG releases.
> 			regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

In response to


pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-01 05:13:44
Subject: Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-01 03:48:51
Subject: Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group