Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL flamage on Slashdot

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL flamage on Slashdot
Date: 2003-03-17 03:29:20
Message-ID: 1047871760.757.4.camel@tokyo (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 22:23, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> mode=thread&cid=5525863

Well, sure -- not all the comments are going to be entirely positive.
But from the comments I read, the overall impression of PostgreSQL was
fairly positive.



Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2003-03-17 14:53:59
Subject: Re: gborg - who maintains it?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-03-17 03:23:58
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL flamage on Slashdot

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group