Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Off topic - was Re: ALTER SEQUENCE

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Off topic - was Re: ALTER SEQUENCE
Date: 2003-03-03 13:59:34
Message-ID: 1046699974.99831.2.camel@jester (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
I think the mail server was busted over the last couple of days
(Thursday till Sunday afternoon).

Read archives of -hackers, you'll see there were a few conversations
going on that were never actually distributed.

Anyway, nothing wrong with re-posting them.

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 02:06, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi,
> I have sent in a few patches in the last couple of days (and resent) and
> they haven't appeared on the lists - what's going on?
> Chris
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-03-03 14:46:17
Subject: Testing ... ignore ...
Previous:From: Tommi MaekitaloDate: 2003-03-03 13:53:50
Subject: Re: Yet another open-source benchmark

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-03-03 14:32:43
Subject: Re: psql patch for datestyle
Previous:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2003-03-03 07:09:32
Subject: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Sebastiano CascioneDate: 2003-03-03 14:20:29
Subject: pg_dump version
Previous:From: Oleg SamoylovDate: 2003-03-03 13:50:10
Subject: Re: transparent use of pre-aggregated value for very large datasets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group