Re: Off topic - was Re: ALTER SEQUENCE

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Off topic - was Re: ALTER SEQUENCE
Date: 2003-03-03 13:59:34
Message-ID: 1046699974.99831.2.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I think the mail server was busted over the last couple of days
(Thursday till Sunday afternoon).

Read archives of -hackers, you'll see there were a few conversations
going on that were never actually distributed.

Anyway, nothing wrong with re-posting them.

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 02:06, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have sent in a few patches in the last couple of days (and resent) and
> they haven't appeared on the lists - what's going on?
>
> Chris
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sebastiano Cascione 2003-03-03 14:20:29 pg_dump version
Previous Message Oleg Samoylov 2003-03-03 13:50:10 Re: transparent use of pre-aggregated value for very large datasets

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-03-03 14:46:17 Testing ... ignore ...
Previous Message Tommi Maekitalo 2003-03-03 13:53:50 Re: Yet another open-source benchmark

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-03 14:32:43 Re: psql patch for datestyle
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-03-03 07:09:32 pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)