Re: Patch needed fot dt.h

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org (Michael Meskes)
Subject: Re: Patch needed fot dt.h
Date: 2007-05-21 14:17:30
Message-ID: 10457.1179757050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
> With latest modification on src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/dt_common.c,
> DTK_ISODOW is not defined. The patch attached needs to be applied on 8.1
> and 8.2 branches to compile successfully.

I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on
DTK_ISODOW in the first place. That looks more like a copy&paste
error than something intentional. Michael?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-05-21 14:21:33 Re: Concurrent psql patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-05-21 14:03:02 Re: Synchronized Scan