Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion.
Date: 2006-10-09 23:41:52
Message-ID: 10433.1160437312@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion. The rule is now
> ----

> Uh, you mean pg_dump, right?

Sheesh, and I did read that message over twice before committing :-(.
Long day, time for a break.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-10 00:19:51 pgsql: Update libpq.rc for 7.3.16 and 7.4.14.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-09 23:39:27 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-10-10 00:08:21 Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-09 23:40:34 Re: width_bucket function for timestamps