| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch for BETWEEN [ASYMMETRIC|SYMMETRIC] |
| Date: | 2001-01-11 03:45:03 |
| Message-ID: | 10337.979184703@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> I *assume* that this will have trouble making it in to 7.1, and since
> keywords are likely added this may have trouble with 7.1.x (not sure
> about that; perhaps the lex-generated token values never make it into
> the database tables, but they *do* propagate into structures used deeper
> in the backend).
Since he didn't add a new parsetree node type, there wouldn't be any
database compatibility issue AFAIK. I'm pretty certain that keyword
token values never get into stored rules.
However, there is our self-imposed "no new features during beta" rule.
This looks like a relatively harmless patch, but do we want to break
that rule for something that people are not beating down our doors for?
I'd vote for holding it for 7.2, I think.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2001-01-11 07:43:39 | Lock on arbitrary string feature |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-01-11 03:32:54 | Re: patch for BETWEEN [ASYMMETRIC|SYMMETRIC] |